Are multi-year software subscriptions for schools value for money?


Are software subscriptions value for money?
Software subscriptions – value for money?

Over the years the software industry has undergone transformational change arising from new technology which has led to:

  • Enhanced software functionality
  • Reduced infrastructure costs for users e.g. via cloud delivery
  • Integrated in-office and mobile solutions

These technology changes are complemented by greater flexibility in how software is licensed. The earlier dominance of perpetual licensing has in many sectors given way to subscription based licensing. Subscription licensing is typically offered on a per user or per site basis and depending upon the application terms range from a month to a year with renewal reminders being issued in advance enabling subscribers to cancel if needed.

Subscription licensing enables a software vendor to adopt a more granular approach to licensing. It enables users to subscribe for the functionality they actually intend to use and benefit from rather than having to license an entire package while only using a limited set of functions.

This approach also allows users to start by only licensing the functionality initially required and then expand into other functions at a later date. Given the tremendous variety of need, experience and resources across schools this is an important ability – why should a school incur costs before it needs to? This flexibility provides value for money as licence expenditure is tied more closely with usage.

Multi-year Deals

Sometimes subscription licenses are bundled into multi-year deals for individual schools, federations or multi-academy trusts in exchange for a nominal discount for advance payment. While beneficial to the vendor this type of arrangement is only value for money if a school is operating in a stable and secure environment and the licence provides the flexibility to cope with future changes.

For example, the following could impact upon on your licence:

  • The school’s approach to managing data changes e.g. a school joins a multi-academy trust
  • Maintenance contract changes lead to a different approach to managing data e.g. a new contractor assumes responsibility for data management
  • Senior leadership changes lead to a re-think in systems which support a school

In the above examples can your licence (and any pre-paid subscription!) be novated or transferred without incurring additional charges or penalties?

You also need to be confident that in a long-term, multi-year contract the existing provider will continue to represent excellent value for money. Who can predict what impact future commercial and technological innovations will have in a market? If you want to change provider mid-way through a multi-year subscription in all likelihood the pre-paid license fees are not fully refundable.

As for Altuity – we offer subscriptions which typically renew on a three-month to one year cycle on a pay-by-use basis so that you license the functionality you’re going to be using.  In addition for smaller organisations such as primary schools, who may be using manual or spreadsheet processes, we’re introducing licensing calculated on data usage. This provides an entry-level licensing option tied to usage and not the number of users or pupils which in the past has excluded smaller schools from being able to take advantage of commercially supported and maintained software.

In summary, a headline discount offered as an incentive to commit to a multi-year deal will not always represent long-term value for money. The flexibility offered by shorter terms and different models based on the number of schools (e.g. in a multi-academy trust), users or data usage enables schools to license software according to their needs in a future-proofed way. These options are offered with Altuity’s AltoSites asset and maintenance system.

Spreadsheet assets and reusing site and floor plans

Many asset and maintenance managers have physical and intangible asset information in spreadsheets as illustrated below. This can provide a simple and effective way to manage this information but doesn’t intuitively help with locational context.  The blurring used to hide the data below is also a metaphor for how difficult it is to understand data in this purely textual form.

What if you could take this spreadsheet data and simply and easily manage it in a more visual and intuitive way on site and floor plans?

With increasing amounts of data to manage visualisation creates a picture of your assets helping you immediately and visually see what assets you have; where they’re located and, where relevant their status. These benefits apply to physical and intangible assets. This valuable insight improves day-to-day administration and helps with prioritisation and reporting.

To help users with spreadsheets we’ve enhanced the bulk data loading ability of AltoSites and AltoSUE to provide a number of new features:-

  • Automatically locate data on site and floor plans e.g. by room or asset identifier;
  • Automatically cluster data on plans e.g. where there is a lot of data for a room automatically cluster it for convenience and clarity;
  • Automatically cluster data in defined map locations such as estates, grounds and construction sites;
  • Automatically cluster data in locations defined by a user including by user-definable attribute information e.g. cluster all documents of a particular type together such as separating leases from insurances or by user-definable labels which do not exist in plans.

In addition, as an added feature users can assign their own icons to these clusters so that they can see the data presented in a way which is meaningful to them e.g. a document icon could represent a cluster of documents or a car icon could represent a cluster consisting of vehicle leases.

Example: Floor Plan with room based clusters

In the screen shot below asset data was loaded from a spreadsheet and automatically located to the correct room. The screen shot shows how it’s possible to click on a cluster to ‘explode’ it into its individual records. A user can then click on one of these records to see its information. In this example, the exploded icon contains documents and a filing cabinet style icon is used to denote this. A user can therefore immediately see what type of data this is before even accessing the record.

Spreadsheet assets located on a floor plan
Spreadsheet assets located on a floor plan

Example: Multiple types of records

In this example we can see how different types of data are easily categorised. At the top two markers represent gas connection points; a blue marker in the middle represents a water supply and the two red markers are outstanding defects (one for a window and one for a door).

Floor plan with point assets and a cluster


In the middle there is a cluster of four records and the user has chosen to use a customised green icon to represent the cluster rather than the circular icons used in the previous example.



Floor plan with point assets and an exploded cluster
Floor plan with point assets and an exploded cluster.


The screen shot to the right shows this cluster exploded.

The cluster in this example contains compliance documents.



Example: Clusters and Maps

Clusters can also be used on maps (icons representing single physical or intangible assets can also be used as shown below). This means it’s possible to locate information about features outside of buildings in their proper place. In the example below a cluster of 8 records are positioned in the estate. This could equally be a section of highway or construction site.

Cluster of assets on a map
Cluster of assets on a map

Using these features it becomes easier to understand, find and update data. Separate reporting and analytical capabilities provide further benefits.

To discover how easy it is for you to move into a visual approach to managing your spreadsheet data contact us for an informal discussion.

Maintenance and Multi-Academy Trusts

Multi-Academy Trust Collaboration
Multi-Academy Trust Collaboration

This week’s announcement that all schools in England will either have to convert to Academy status by 2020 or be committed to converting by 2022 has put academies into the spotlight again. Schools currently under local authority control potentially face increased costs as economies of scale available via the authority disappear.

6 out of 10 academies are forecasted to be running a deficit in the next two years placing continual pressures and challenges on school leaders and managers to maximise efficiency and cost savings. Collaborative working has a valuable role in meeting these challenges. Collaboration takes many forms such as Multi-Academy Trusts, federations, clusters or simply an informal working arrangement between schools. This blog for convenience refers to multi-academy trusts although the principles apply to any grouping of schools / academies.

Collaboration provides:

  • Opportunities to get access to services on a shared cost basis enabling schools to take advantage of services previously inaccessible or too expensive to utilise.
  • Income streams to schools offering these services. Typically, these are shared teaching, financial or administrative services.

Saving costs in Asset and Maintenance management

Asset and maintenance management collaboration offers several benefits:

  • Potential cost savings by pooling capital works through larger contracts.
  • Simpler project management and less costs by working with one contractor rather than several across a network of schools.
  • Co-ordinating routine maintenance activities. For example, identifying that several schools require re-painting or refurbishment offers the opportunity to co-ordinate work into higher value contracts. This may secure larger discounts than can be achieved individually.
  • Prioritisation of resources based on need e.g. assessing capital maintenance funding needs and the later allocation of these funds within a multi-academy trust or cluster.

A holistic view of a multi-academy trust’s asset and maintenance requirements is essential to support the above.

Delivering holistic multi-academy maintenance

Bursars and school business managers need to co-ordinate asset and maintenance management requirements.

One approach is to introduce a single maintenance system across the multi-academy trust. However, this may not be appropriate if systems are already in place given the investment a school or academy will have spent already.

An alternative is to integrate disparate

Federated multi-academy maintenance data
Figure 1: Federated multi-academy maintenance data

asset and maintenance data from these systems. This federated approach enables individual schools to continue to use their preferred systems while benefiting by pooling certain data.



Either approach ideally requires a system which can:

  1. Offer a maintenance capability on its own merits for those academies that wish to use it; and / or
  2. Collate data from other systems to act as a central analytics and reporting portal.

Systems such as Altuity’s AltoSites™ include their own maintenance capability and uses REST API’s to provide connectivity to other systems. Summary information such as planned capital works programmes and maintenance activities could then be shared. Pooled data could also be used for Key Performance Indicators highlighting different issues that maybe facing a MAT’s academies.

Information can be compared very easily using analytics and dashboards. Two example reports are illustrated below.

Comparing Maintenance data in a multi-academy trust
Figure 2: Comparing Maintenance data in a multi-academy trust
Figure 3: Comparing total estimated repair costs in a multi-academy trust


The benefits of collaborative working extend into asset and maintenance management processes. This is achievable via a single cross-academy maintenance solution in a multi-academy trust, federation or cluster or alternatively via a federated approach. This delivers a holistic view of the group’s needs and priorities.

Such capabilities are essential given the ever increasing financial challenges within the education sector.

This blog is an extract from our eBook – click the title to download it – ‘Reducing School Capital and Maintenance Costs

To assess how your multi-academy trust, federation or cluster can benefit in terms of collaborative asset and maintenance management please contact us.

PhysiCAD Research and CAD

Earlier this year, while in discussions with Bristol University, we were asked if we’d like to take part in a new research project called PhysiCAD. Being very focused on delivering highly visual user interfaces in AltoSites and AltoSUE (currently using maps and CAD plans) research in this space was definitely of interest.

CAD Limitations

Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software is highly versatile and useful. It has, in fact, been instrumental in helping foster and maintain the United Kingdom’s reputation for innovation (currently ranked in the top ten countries in the world). However, to be used effectively it requires in-depth knowledge and the time and/or financial resources necessary to properly utilise it. It is, to put it simply, highly complex software and, accordingly, many good ideas are slow to progress or falter long before a commercially viable product is available; especially where advanced modelling, simulation and analysis (virtual prototyping) are involved. However, the limitations with CAD go far beyond a lack of expertise or resources – whether financial or temporal.

Physicality is a fundamental desire for humans; the deep-seated need to interact, shape, and impose order upon our surroundings. In order to fully interact with the design process a degree of physicality is necessary. The greater the physicality the greater the user engagement, their creative potential, and – importantly – the success of the project’s goals. However, traditional CAD systems are severely limited in these respects. They impose 2D (or 3D virtual) limits on a project which undermines the potential of a given idea or project – hence the increasing interest in 3D printing within prototyping.

The Role of PhysiCAD in Physicality

The purpose of PhysiCAD is to provide a platform which dramatically increases the level of physicality possible allowing the user to bypass the limitations noted above by not only simplifying – as well as increasing the speed and quality of – the design process but to also make CAD and other virtual prototyping tools more readily accessible. To achieve this the research is investigating a tangible interface for CAD, virtual prototyping and rapid prototyping.

An illustration of the PhysiCAD process is shown below:-

PhysiCAD Process
PhysiCAD Process

The PhysiCAD research programme consists of two interrelated research streams. The first addresses the technical and HCI challenges associated with the creation of real-time physical-to-digital model integration and user-in-the-loop digital-to-physical model integration. The second research stream concerns investigation of the affordances, complementarity (with Virtual Prototyping tools) and limitations of a Lego-inspired tangible interface for improving collaboration/co-creation, design performance and accessibility to virtual prototyping and rapid prototyping.

PhysiCAD has been given the go ahead and is due to start in November. Follow us on Twitter or LinkedIn to be notified of updates as the project progresses.

More information on PhysiCAD (renamed from LegoCAD which is referenced in the link) is available here

Watchers and Alerts: renewals, assets and maintenance defects

Software applications need to offer proactive management tools to enable users to cope with ever-increasing data volumes. Effective measures are needed to minimise the financial and non-financial costs of missing important events such as renewals or critical data changes.

Integrating proactive alert functionality, such as email, into an application is a key aspect of improving data management. These days this isn’t rocket science so we decided to make sure that our email integration provides more than a simple reminder service.

Maintenance triggers and alerts
Maintenance triggers and alerts

Key Deliverables

  • Monitor expiration dates – such as renewals for insurances, leases, certificates or vehicle taxes.
  • Provide alerts when other users create, update or relocate specific records to a new position. For example, when defects of a particular priority are created or assets of a particular type are installed.
  • User customisable trigger events including when alerts are triggered.
  • User customisable email content.
  • Enable records to be automatically updated by triggers, such as, setting a date or changing a record’s status.
  • Create chained events so that trigger events can in turn trigger later ones.

How does it work ?

  1. User definable query filters search for records of interest based on any attributes. For example, all records created after a particular date, or all records of a particular type, such as vehicle leases, due to expire in the next 60 days; amounts, priorities or any other attribute data whether it be for documents (contracts, leases, insurances, certificates etc), assets or maintenance defects.
  2. Geo-location can also be used in searches. This allows the search to be restricted to particular areas of a site or building allowing the software to let users know when data in specific areas triggers an event. For example, this allows the installation of new assets to be automatically tracked improving performance monitoring.
  3. Watchers are then created which automatically apply the filters. Watchers allow the user to:-
    • Define the events a user Is interested in tracking such as creating, updating and changing the location of a record or simply check for expiring dates and renewals.
    • Define the frequency with which the software should check for events.
    • Enable users to define their own customisable email messages adding to the information in the email the software generates.
    • Send the email to one or more recipients.
    • Watchers can undertake a number of optional tasks:-
    • Perform updates as an event is triggered. For example update a date field to show when a reminder was sent or automatically change the status of a record;
    • Create an event as a result of a previous event being triggered. This powerful process creates chains of events or actions;
    • Create activities – maintenance defects can automatically trigger an activities action for a contractor.

These features enable a comprehensive set of data events to be watched for and acted upon. Users responsible for their own site or facilities data are better empowered. Service providers managing their clients’ data, such as maintenance organisations, can automatically deliver added value communications enhancing their customer service.

Buried Services – making the invisible visible


On the 2nd March the Institute of Civil Engineers (ICE) is hosting a seminar “Improving visibility and resilience of our Buried Service” because “there remains no central repository of data for buried services and underground apparatus, nor any consistent means of sharing it

The introduction of a data standard for underground assets is a positive initiative in facilitating information sharing. However a central repository isn’t the only option and this blog briefly considers a federated approach. A future blog will comment on a hybrid system.

Federated Systems

Centralised, national solutions have a chequered history of success whether for adoption in a single organisation or across multiple organisations each with their own priorities and pressures whether they are commercial, financial, legal or security related.

For example, many will remember the national CSRWR (Centralised Street and Road Works Register) which was due to be implemented across England and Wales before being cancelled. CSRWR was replaced by a standard communication protocol called ETON (Electronic Transfer of Notices).  ETON enables street works software developers, and organisations with their own systems, to exchange data directly among themselves – a federated environment.  Originally intended as a temporary solution it’s so successful it continues in use today removing the need for a central system.

Federated multi-academy maintenance data
Federated systems communicating over the web in an ETON style solution.

ETON is an example of coopetition competitors working together on a common cause while retaining the ability for them to innovate and compete for market share. This is good for industry and good for customers.



Another example of a federated approach is that used in Open BIM which uses IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) as an “open, neutral data format”. Open BIM:-

  • Supports standardisation
  • Maintains choice in the market for users as “small and large software vendors can participate and compete on system independent, ‘best of breed’ solutions.”
  • Doesn’t restrict competition nor innovation

These Open BIM principles could be the foundation for a federated systems approach to managing buried services and underground assets. As well as the physical exchange of data though we need to consider how some-one wanting information about a particular location would achieve that without a central system.

The answer is that data standards and protocols enable organisations to exchange information and make enquiries without needing to be initiated by, or routed through, a central system. This also has the advantage of retaining control of asset information within the federated systems (whether in-house or commercial products) which asset owners may prefer for commercial, security and other reasons. It also ensures there’s no single point of failure.

Finally, The ICE agenda also describes how a system could be – “Easily accessible and free, with charge-able data/services downstream”.  Our initial focus should be on the need for an open standard and not the commercial model for the implementation of a central system.  The private sector has led the way in the development of freemium services and some existing service providers already offer free at the point of access services in this sector.

We should keep the market open and let free market forces influence how suppliers offer their services. Customer choice should be maintained. I wouldn’t want to be at the behest of a single supplier determining chargeable services – would you?


A standard framework and protocol for data exchange will help make the invisible visible. The physical implementation of this standard is another consideration and other alternatives such as federated systems:-

  • Encourage a vibrant and disparate software and services industry;
  • Stimulate innovation
  • Preserve customer choice.

Positional Intelligence for Underground Assets

One of the challenges in subsurface utility engineering (SUE) is a lack of reliable positional intelligence about underground assets. Where are they, and once located, what information do we have about them. Better positional intelligence leads to safer and more effective working practises which in turn improve the bottom line.

“Daylighting”, defined in CI/ASCE 38-02, is the highest level of accuracy, providing information on the vertical and horizontal positions of underground utilities and attributes such as type, size, condition and material.

Tagging underground utilities
Tagging underground utilities

Daylighting is an apt term as it implies bringing greater clarity to underground asset data.  While we cannot physically raise assets above ground to bring them into the daylight we can take steps to ensure data is visible, accessible and current thus improving the positional intelligence available to us.

A life cycle approach to improving positional intelligence requires data from site plans and surveys (e.g. from CAD), on site (as built / as maintained) data, asset and maintenance management systems and Geographical Information Systems (GIS). A key dependency is asset location.

Locating Underground Assets

Missing or inaccurate location records result in issues such as increased service strikes; heightened risks to health and safety and increased works costs. The location of underground assets can be recorded using a single method or several to reflect the degree of accuracy required; level of risk; budget and time available. For example:-

  1. Passive Remote Frequency Identification (RFiD ) – with or without GPS
  2. GPS
  3. Geo-tagged photographs
  4. Engineering survey methods such as GPR.
  5. Textual descriptions including attributes facilitating integration into other systems e.g. datum and node points and section details along a pipe.

PAS 128 “Specification for underground utility detection verification and location” references the potential use of RFiD for tagging underground assets. RFiD tags can cost effectively and accurately mark potential areas of failure such as joints or valves. Data associated with a tagged asset can be stored in the cloud. This is vital to ensure data is accessible; there’s little point in burying a tag and its vital asset information.

Accessibility is enhanced in an intuitive, visual context. For example, AltoSUE™ uses a geospatial cloud based database and maps and / or site survey plans provide locational context. Overlaying data on site plans is invaluable as the map detail may not be accurate nor up to date for construction use.  An output from a PAS128 survey will be a CAD plan of the utility services. Making these plans available on mobile devices overlaid with tagged asset data as well as the ability to use background maps enhances on site working.

Tagged underground asset portal
Tagged underground asset portal

Integrating on site and cloud based technologies improves the efficiency of data recording and sharing.  Collect using tablets or smartphones; upload to the cloud and make it available to on and offsite users immediately or with minimal delay.

Data Convergence

The positional intelligence of underground assets is enhanced by enabling other records to be easily accessible on and offsite such as:

  • project information
  • engineering records
  • health and safety
  • risk assessments
  • 3D data

3D models add value to the repository of underground asset data. However, treat these with caution as they often represent ‘as designed’ states; not the ‘as built’ nor later ‘as maintained’ states. The industry is still working towards practical and cost-effective solutions to the challenge of using 3D models with a variety of innovations under development and coming to the market. Keeping asset life cycle data current has always been a challenge and will become more so as Building Information Modelling (BIM) becomes widely adopted.


Better positional intelligence is fundamental to improving SUE. A holistic approach to managing underground assets requires a number of discrete but integrated processes:-

  • Identification of underground asset location via RFiD, geo-tagging etc
  • Capturing data on site
  • Managing and facilitating access to it on and off site
  • Supplementing on site data with other records e.g. site survey plans as well as maps and engineering data to aid with the quick and safe relocation of underground assets
  • Integrating SUE data into corporate systems for asset and maintenance management purposes

Daylighting our SUE data provides a safer working environment for on site workers; less disruption and more efficient and profitable works activities.

The themes in this blog are explored in more detail in our white paper – “Daylighting Underground Assets’ 



Better access to Facilities and Site Management Software

Facilities management (FM) professionals using manual processes or struggling with complex, functionally rich software need a new paradigm allowing easier access to software. Facilities and estate managers are responsible for a huge variety of estates varying in extent and complexity. Controlling the information associated with these estates is challenging.

Larger estates have more data to manage but typically have greater resources; smaller estates with less of a data management issue have fewer resources so that in relative terms the pressures are similar. For example, managing site records, infrastructure and asset data might be a part-time role as is common in the education sector.

To help manage the disparate needs of these sites a range of software solutions are available:-

  • Infrastructure site records management systems;
  • Maintenance and asset management systems;
  • Computer aided facilities management (CAFM) systems;
  • Document management systems;
  • Geographical Information Systems (GIS);
  • Computer Aided Design (CAD) software.

The above solutions tend to focus on medium to larger sized estates and provide substantial benefits from a management perspective. The required investment in consultancy, training, licensing and on-going support fees is worthwhile due to the complexity of these environments. However, site or facilities managers responsible for less extensive estates may find themselves disenfranchised from solutions. They will often tackle their site records management challenges using paper or manual processes or in-house systems based on e.g. Access® or Excel®.

A recent survey conducted by Facilities Management Journal (FMJ) and Causeway found that up to 65% of estates with 6-10 buildings use paper or manual processes to manage property data and even for those with 11-100 buildings just under 50% were managed manually (1).

The antithesis to this situation are those sites with the capacity to adopt solutions but find themselves with systems which are over complex. As the complexity of requirements increases so does the sophistication of the software as illustrated in figure 1.

Facilities Management Software Solutions
Fig 1: Facilities Management Software Solutions landscape.

Manual / paper based  – No systems in use.

Entry level – Some degree of software used to ease management typically through in-house means e.g.  Access®, Excel® etc

Med-Tier – Greater use of software whether more developed internal software or the use of commercial packages.

Enterprise Tier – Large estates, complex data management requirements within a complex IT environment necessitates the use of complex commercial packages.

For some estates this creates a dynamic where the software becomes too complex for their needs which results in functional redundancy as parts (or all !) of the software isn’t used. The worst case scenario is when the software drives the business and not vice versa. Processes and work flows become complicated by the software – not as a result of a business need. They become more complicated simply because they can.

However, a new paradigm encompassing several factors is now available to help site and facilities managers:-

  • innovative technology;
  • flexible design;
  • short and simple implementations;
  • using the cloud as a delivery mechanism, and
  • flexible commercial terms

This new paradigm reduces entry-level barriers to software adoption. Previously disenfranchised users now have the option to consider software solutions because the factors above have created a new solutions landscape. For example, those managers dependent upon manual and paper processes can now gain access to solutions scaled and fit for their purpose.

Equally, those with a need to manage sites on a temporary basis e.g. over several months on a construction site can now access software quickly and efficiently. Site records and the location of critical underground infrastructure, whether permanent or temporary, is sharable between client, contractors and sub-contractors.

Interestingly, managers also have a wider degree of choice. A choice which means they could even consider downsizing from an overly complex or expensive solution to one more appropriate to their requirements and without inherent lock-ins.

(1)     “Managing the state of the estate”, FMJ, Causeway, September, 2014

Site Records Management Video

Illustrating the key concepts of our site records solution for site and facilities managers required an explainer video. How did we arrive at this decision and what lessons did we learn ?

Site and facilities managers work in a complex environment. They manage a vast array of data ranging from site survey data and plans through to health and safety records, risk assessments, assets, inspections and defects etc.

Asset and Maintenance data
A diverse range of Asset and Maintenance data

Maintaining site records for compliance with statutory regulations as well as for operational reasons is vitally important. Given the challenge of these responsibilities how best to explain AltoSites™ a cloud based solution managing this data ?

A picture speaks a 1,000 words so a short explainer video ought to say a lot more. Watching a quick insight into a solution or product is extremely useful when trying to quickly understand whether something is relevant to your needs. So we decided to use an explainer video to showcase the key benefits and features of AltoSites.

Key factors for our video

  • Our industry and the managers maintaining sites and facilities

A key challenge was deciding what to include and what to leave out. What information does a viewer need to see to help decide whether AltoSites deserves further consideration ? For us the challenge was how to convey the simplicity and ease of use of AltoSites whilst illustrating its key benefits.

We decided to focus on the visual use of maps and CAD plans within a browser environment upon which site records and assets are managed.

For many site and facilities

Floor plans and asset managemen
Floor plans and asset management

managers this is the first time they will have had access to this level of visualisation. The ability to use maps and CAD plans interactively to locate and query data without expensive third-party software whether you’re in a built environment or on a new construction site provides significant benefits.

  • Video design and imaging

Having decided on the content how best to show this within the video ? A search on the web quickly revealed many styles ranging from 2D or 3D cartoon character type approaches; white board simulations and graphics through to real life filming.

We’re in a business to business not a business to consumer industry. We felt that our viewers needed a professional and intelligent approach which didn’t risk trivialising site records management.

We discounted the cartoon based imagery often led by a character, as potentially being inappropriate and distracting. The white board videos are good for presentation style videos but lacked the ability to give insight into the real software.

Managing defects on a plan and map
Managing defects on a plan and map

We opted for a graphical representation which follows the concepts and workflow used within AltoSites combined with a professional voice over and the non-intrusive use of music in the background.

Key Lessons Learned

  1. Focus – identify the key messages you need to convey
  2. Prototype – test ideas and flow with storyboards
  3. Balance – the script is as important as the visuals
  4. Brevity – 1:30 – 2 minutes in length is generally acceptable which means at most 250 – 300 words  (this was a challenge !)
  5. Flexibility – be ready to accept changes in direction or emphasis as your concept and ideas develop – ensure you have this flexibility built into your project costs and timelines.
  6. Coherence – ensure there’s consistency between messaging, graphics, brand, voice over and music. No single element should compete with others for attention.

Our AltoSites’ explainer video is here and end of screen credits and thanks go to:-

The $64million dollar question is what did you think of our video ?!

Site Infrastructure Records – Something for Nothing ?

Among the challenges faced by facilities managers, site managers, bursars and school business managers responsible for looking after site infrastructure are how to:-shutterstock_142560139 (1)

  • Maintain control of site infrastructure records;
  • Search and access records quickly and efficiently, and
  • Maintain backups of site data.

Ideally these challenges should be met without incurring unnecessary overheads in direct costs or additional time – effectively providing something for nothing. Within AltoSites we adopted a pragmatic approach to these challenges to minimise the draw on a manager’s time whilst providing significant benefits in terms of managing site infrastructure records. Let’s look briefly at each in turn:-

Maintain control of site infrastructure records

AltoSites provides a means to quickly and easily store records on a secure system whether that’s Word, Excel, PDF’s, Site or Floor plans etc.

Search and access records quickly and efficiently

    • AltoSites enables you to define your own data which can be used for search purposes – saving time when it comes to searching for information in the future.
    • Storing the physical records in a database enables you to do key word text searches within documents e.g. find all assets with associated documents containing the words ‘gas isolation’.
    • Locating records and documents on a map and/or site plan provides a clear visual context making them easier to see and understand.

      Clusters of data on a map
      Clusters of data on a map
    • AltoSites exposes the valuable data in site and floor plans for use within a browser alongside all of your other asset and infrastructure site records. For example, switch layers of data on and off such as those related to gas, water and electrical utilities.
    • CAD Floor plan in a browser - layers with overlaid defects
    • You can define your own spatial search areas. This is more than searching for data relating to Building A, 2nd Floor, Room 5. It means providing the ability to create a polygon area on a site which could include multiple buildings or buildings and external estate and then retrieving assets and infrastructure site records within the bounding area.
    • Finally – we provide a means to combine one or more of the above options for more advanced searches.
    • Spatial polygon defect search across a CAD floor plan
      Spatial polygon defect search across a CAD floor plan

Maintain backups of site data

Routine backups of your PC’s documents directory or shared drives maybe being undertaken (are they ?!) but how often are the backups stored offsite for ease of access in a disaster or emergency ? If you have a Site Disaster and Emergency plan is that easily accessible off site ? AltoSites provides this by default through virtue of being cloud based – meaning that no extra effort is required on your part because as you use the system your data is implicitly being secured on the cloud.

Something for nothing ?

Well not quite but not far off. Being able to manage your site’s data in the way described above helps you operationally and also ensures critical information is being securely stored offsite giving you additional benefits. This is important whether your site has tens or thousands of site infrastructure records to manage.